Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Baldwin v. U.S., CV15-6004 RGK (AGRx). (2019)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20190613a21 Visitors: 20
Filed: Jun. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2019
Summary: [Proposed] Amended Judgment R. GARY KLAUSNER , District Judge . Pursuant to the Opinion of the Ninth Circuit (document number 93): IT IS ORDERED that the Judgment entered in favor of Howard L. Baldwin and Karen Baldwin (document number 78) is vacated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the award of litigation costs to Howard L. Baldwin and Karen Baldwin (document number 83) is vacated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. IT IS SO ORDERED.

[Proposed] Amended Judgment

Pursuant to the Opinion of the Ninth Circuit (document number 93):

IT IS ORDERED that the Judgment entered in favor of Howard L. Baldwin and Karen Baldwin (document number 78) is vacated.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the award of litigation costs to Howard L. Baldwin and Karen Baldwin (document number 83) is vacated.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer