Washington v. Cornstock, 2:18-cv-06518-CBM (MAA). (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190917880
Visitors: 15
Filed: Sep. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 13, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSUELO B. MARSHALL , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the time for filing objections has expired and no objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and adopts them as its own findings and conclusions. IT IS THEREF
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSUELO B. MARSHALL , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the time for filing objections has expired and no objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and adopts them as its own findings and conclusions. IT IS THEREFO..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
CONSUELO B. MARSHALL, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the time for filing objections has expired and no objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and adopts them as its own findings and conclusions.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this lawsuit be dismissed without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
