Coronado v. RSCR California, Inc., 2:19-cv-10692-RGK-JEM. (2020)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20200205c16
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jan. 31, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 31, 2020
Summary: [ PROPOSED ] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE R. GARY KLAUSNER , District Judge . On January 22, 2020, the parties filed a "Joint Stipulation Dismissing Action With Prejudice." In accordance with the parties' Joint Stipulation, and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Joint Stipulation Dismissing Action With Prejudice is accepted by the Court; and 2. The Action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). IT IS SO ORDER
Summary: [ PROPOSED ] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE R. GARY KLAUSNER , District Judge . On January 22, 2020, the parties filed a "Joint Stipulation Dismissing Action With Prejudice." In accordance with the parties' Joint Stipulation, and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Joint Stipulation Dismissing Action With Prejudice is accepted by the Court; and 2. The Action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). IT IS SO ORDERE..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
R. GARY KLAUSNER, District Judge.
On January 22, 2020, the parties filed a "Joint Stipulation Dismissing Action With Prejudice." In accordance with the parties' Joint Stipulation, and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. The Joint Stipulation Dismissing Action With Prejudice is accepted by the Court; and
2. The Action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
