Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

JOSEPH v. CENTERPOINT ENERGY ENTEX, 66 So.3d 557 (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals of California Number: inlaco20110525281 Visitors: 11
Filed: Aug. 10, 2011
Latest Update: Aug. 10, 2011
Summary: PETERS, J. For the reasons assigned in Jones v. Centerpoint Energy Entex, 11-2 (La.App. 3 Cir. 5/25/11), 66 So.3d 539 , we affirm the trial court judgment in favor of Dai'Jhnea Joseph, Steven Joseph, and Constance Joseph in all respects. We assess all costs of this appeal to the defendants, Centerpoint Energy Entex; Centerpoint Energy Resources Corporation; Centerpoint Energy Marketing, Inc.; Entex Gas Resources Corporation; Centerpoint Energy Gas Services, Inc.; Centerpoint Energy Gas Trans
More

PETERS, J.

For the reasons assigned in Jones v. Centerpoint Energy Entex, 11-2 (La.App. 3 Cir. 5/25/11), 66 So.3d 539, we affirm the trial court judgment in favor of Dai'Jhnea Joseph, Steven Joseph, and Constance Joseph in all respects. We assess all costs of this appeal to the defendants, Centerpoint Energy Entex; Centerpoint Energy Resources Corporation; Centerpoint Energy Marketing, Inc.; Entex Gas Resources Corporation; Centerpoint Energy Gas Services, Inc.; Centerpoint Energy Gas Transmission Company; and Reliant Energy Resources Corporation.

AFFIRMED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer