U.S. v. CHAHAL, CR S-09-0125 KJM. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20120423588
Visitors: 19
Filed: Apr. 19, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 19, 2012
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge. On March 30, 2012 defendant filed a request to unseal the transcript of the February 8, 2010 hearing (ECF 111) for the purpose of inclusion in his appeal. The government has opposed this request. While the filing of a notice of appeal "confers jurisdiction on the court of appeals and divests the district court of its control as to aspects of the case involved in appeal," Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56 , 58 (1982), assembling
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge. On March 30, 2012 defendant filed a request to unseal the transcript of the February 8, 2010 hearing (ECF 111) for the purpose of inclusion in his appeal. The government has opposed this request. While the filing of a notice of appeal "confers jurisdiction on the court of appeals and divests the district court of its control as to aspects of the case involved in appeal," Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56 , 58 (1982), assembling ..
More
ORDER
KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.
On March 30, 2012 defendant filed a request to unseal the transcript of the February 8, 2010 hearing (ECF 111) for the purpose of inclusion in his appeal. The government has opposed this request. While the filing of a notice of appeal "confers jurisdiction on the court of appeals and divests the district court of its control as to aspects of the case involved in appeal," Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58 (1982), assembling the record is not such an aspect.
Accordingly, the government is ordered to file a copy of the February 8, 2010 hearing transcript under seal, with a copy to appellate counsel, Charles Bonneau.
Source: Leagle
