Filed: Oct. 17, 2012
Latest Update: Oct. 17, 2012
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND DATE FOR HEARING OF MOTIONS; ORDER THEREON WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, JASON HITT, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and MARK J. REICHEL, Esq., attorney for defendant, that the present dates for the motions hearing be re calendared for November 19, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. The parties also stipulate and agree that the briefing schedu
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND DATE FOR HEARING OF MOTIONS; ORDER THEREON WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, JASON HITT, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and MARK J. REICHEL, Esq., attorney for defendant, that the present dates for the motions hearing be re calendared for November 19, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. The parties also stipulate and agree that the briefing schedul..
More
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND DATE FOR HEARING OF MOTIONS; ORDER THEREON
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, JASON HITT, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and MARK J. REICHEL, Esq., attorney for defendant, that the present dates for the motions hearing be re calendared for November 19, 2012 at 9:30 a.m.
The parties also stipulate and agree that the briefing schedule shall be amended as follows:
Defense briefing: October 23, 2012
Government Opposition: November 6, 2012
Defense Reply: November 13, 2012
Hearing on defense motions: November 19, 2012 at 9:30 a.m.
This continuance is requested as defense counsel needs adequate time to prepare for the case, and the defense is still reviewing the discovery and will be researching matters. As well, defense counsel will be in negotiations with the government in an effort to resolve the case. As well, defense counsel is currently investigating matters in the case.
Accordingly, all counsel and defendant agree that time under the Speedy Trial Act from the date set for the prior motions hearing, October 15, 2012, through the date of the hearing date now scheduled of November 19, 2012, should be excluded in computing the time within which trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (H)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED. For the reasons set forth above, the court finds that there is GOOD CAUSE for the continuance and the exclusion of time, and that the ends of justice served by this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Time is excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4.
