U.S. v. ROTTEVEEL, 2:11-CR-00447 WBS. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20141127500
Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 26, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 26, 2014
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge. Defendant Hubert Rotteveel, in propria persona, has filed documents entitled Motion for New Trial and Further Argument for the Court to Reconsider the Motion for Judgment of Acquittal. These documents are rejected for the reason that defendant is represented by counsel. If he wishes to proceed pro se in this matter, defendant may file a substitution of counsel or motion to discharge his lawyer. Until then, all communications with the court must be pr
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge. Defendant Hubert Rotteveel, in propria persona, has filed documents entitled Motion for New Trial and Further Argument for the Court to Reconsider the Motion for Judgment of Acquittal. These documents are rejected for the reason that defendant is represented by counsel. If he wishes to proceed pro se in this matter, defendant may file a substitution of counsel or motion to discharge his lawyer. Until then, all communications with the court must be pre..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
Defendant Hubert Rotteveel, in propria persona, has filed documents entitled Motion for New Trial and Further Argument for the Court to Reconsider the Motion for Judgment of Acquittal. These documents are rejected for the reason that defendant is represented by counsel. If he wishes to proceed pro se in this matter, defendant may file a substitution of counsel or motion to discharge his lawyer. Until then, all communications with the court must be presented through his attorney or record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
