Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

FITZPATRICK v. FITZPATRICK, 2:12-cv-2938 GEB AC (PS). (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150618706 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 16, 2015
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , District Judge . Defendants have filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 99. The parties are directed to comply with the briefing schedule set forth at E.D. Cal. R. ("Local Rule") 230. Specifically: plaintiff's opposition, or statement of non-opposition, shall be served and filed no later than July 8, 2015; defendants' reply, if any, shall be served and filed no later than July 15, 2015. However, the hearing on the motion, currently scheduled for July 22, 2015,
More

ORDER

Defendants have filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 99. The parties are directed to comply with the briefing schedule set forth at E.D. Cal. R. ("Local Rule") 230. Specifically: plaintiff's opposition, or statement of non-opposition, shall be served and filed no later than July 8, 2015; defendants' reply, if any, shall be served and filed no later than July 15, 2015.

However, the hearing on the motion, currently scheduled for July 22, 2015, is hereby VACATED.

The date of the upcoming settlement conference, currently scheduled for August 13, 2015, is hereby CONFIRMED.

In the event the case does not settle, the court will take the pending summary judgment motion under submission, or re-schedule a hearing on the motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer