Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Herships v. Groves at Manzanita, 2:15-cv-1838 MCE CKD PS. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160511887 Visitors: 12
Filed: May 10, 2016
Latest Update: May 10, 2016
Summary: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . By order filed April 6, 2016, defendants' motion for more definite statement was granted and plaintiffs were granted leave to file a second amended complaint no later than May 6, 2016. That time period has now expired, and plaintiffs have not filed a second amended complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings
More

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed April 6, 2016, defendants' motion for more definite statement was granted and plaintiffs were granted leave to file a second amended complaint no later than May 6, 2016. That time period has now expired, and plaintiffs have not filed a second amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer