U.S. v. DAVIS, 2:98-cr-0114 KJM AC. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20161114h67
Visitors: 6
Filed: Oct. 31, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 31, 2016
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Movant is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se on an amended motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255. ECF No. 357. Counsel for the government has filed a motion seeking an extension of time to respond to the motion to vacate, but has not indicated in the motion whether he has tried to obtain a stipulation to the extension from movant, who is represented by counsel. See L.R. 144(c). Accordingly, IT IS HER
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Movant is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se on an amended motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255. ECF No. 357. Counsel for the government has filed a motion seeking an extension of time to respond to the motion to vacate, but has not indicated in the motion whether he has tried to obtain a stipulation to the extension from movant, who is represented by counsel. See L.R. 144(c). Accordingly, IT IS HERE..
More
ORDER
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
Movant is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se on an amended motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. ECF No. 357. Counsel for the government has filed a motion seeking an extension of time to respond to the motion to vacate, but has not indicated in the motion whether he has tried to obtain a stipulation to the extension from movant, who is represented by counsel. See L.R. 144(c).
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within seven days of the filing of this order, counsel for the government shall submit a stipulated motion for extension of time or a supplemental declaration explaining why a stipulation cannot be obtained.
Source: Leagle