Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. PRATT, 2:01-cr-00152 WBS AC P. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170109497 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jan. 05, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 05, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff-Respondent United States, through its attorney, Assistant U.S. Attorney Ross K. Naughton, and Defendant-Movant Aaron E. Pratt, through his attorney, Assistant Federal Defender Ann. C. McClintock, hereby stipulate and request to amend the previously ordered briefing schedule (ECF No. 49) as follows: Mr. Pratt's optional Reply to the Government's Opposition to Mr. Pratt's motion und
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Plaintiff-Respondent United States, through its attorney, Assistant U.S. Attorney Ross K. Naughton, and Defendant-Movant Aaron E. Pratt, through his attorney, Assistant Federal Defender Ann. C. McClintock, hereby stipulate and request to amend the previously ordered briefing schedule (ECF No. 49) as follows: Mr. Pratt's optional Reply to the Government's Opposition to Mr. Pratt's motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 shall be filed no later than January 10, 2017.

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing, the previously ordered briefing schedule (ECF No. 49) is hereby AMENDED as follows: Mr. Pratt's optional Reply to the Government's Opposition to Mr. Pratt's motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 shall be filed no later than January 10, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer