Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mercardo v. U.S., 1:13-cv-01535 AWI-JLT. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170113863 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 11, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 11, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST THE UNITED STATES AND PLAINTIFFS SAMUEL MERCARDO AND MUSA GOWON; ORDER ANTHONY W. ISHII , Senior District Judge . On January 10, 2017, the parties filed the following stipulation: Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), the parties hereby stipulate that the first cause of action against the United States and the claims by Plaintiffs Samuel Mercardo and Musa Gowon against all Defendants be dismissed with prejudice
More

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST THE UNITED STATES AND PLAINTIFFS SAMUEL MERCARDO AND MUSA GOWON; ORDER

On January 10, 2017, the parties filed the following stipulation:

Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), the parties hereby stipulate that the first cause of action against the United States and the claims by Plaintiffs Samuel Mercardo and Musa Gowon against all Defendants be dismissed with prejudice. All parties to bear their/its own attorneys fees and costs.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

The Court understands the stipulation as attempting to dismiss two plaintiffs entirely and the first cause of action against the United States. The result of the stipulation would be that: (1) the first cause of would remain, but not against the United States; and (2) all claims by Plaintiffs Mercardo and Gowon would be dismissed. Because all parties have signed the stipulation and the stipulation eliminates all claims by two plaintiffs, the stipulation is automatically effective as to the claims by Mercardo and Gowon. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). However, all claims against the United States are not disposed of, so Rule 41(a)(1) does not automatically dismiss the first cause of action against the United States. Nevertheless, because all parties have signed the stipulation and are in agreement, in the interests of time and saving resources, the Court will give effect to the parties' stipulation and dismiss the first cause of action against the United States with prejudice.

ORDER

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), all claims against all Defendants by Plaintiffs Samuel Mercardo and Musa Gowon are dismissed with prejudice; 2. The Clerk shall note on the docket that Plaintiff's Samuel Mercardo and Musa Gowon were terminated on January 10, 2017; 3. Per the stipulation of the parties, the first cause of action in the First Amended Complaint against the United States is DISMISSED; and 4. This case remains open.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer