Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Castro v. Colvin, 1:16-CV-0723 GSA. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170113909 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 11, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 11, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE GARY S. AUSTIN , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to the Scheduling Order in the above-referenced matter (Doc. 5, p. 4:12-15), IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, that Plaintiff shall have a first-time extension of thirty (30) days to serve her Opening Brief. Plaintiff seeks the extension in order to effectively advocate for Plaintiff in light of six additional briefs currently scheduled for submission on
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Pursuant to the Scheduling Order in the above-referenced matter (Doc. 5, p. 4:12-15), IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, that Plaintiff shall have a first-time extension of thirty (30) days to serve her Opening Brief. Plaintiff seeks the extension in order to effectively advocate for Plaintiff in light of six additional briefs currently scheduled for submission on the same date, January 14, 2017 (which falls on a Saturday, resulting in January 17, 2017 as the current deadline for service). The new date for Plaintiff's Opening Brief shall be on or before February 14, 2017. All corresponding deadlines are modified accordingly.

ORDER

Based upon the above stipulation of the parties, and good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have a first extension of time of thirty (30) days, up to and including February 14, 2017, to file her Opening Brief. All other deadlines set forth in the Scheduling Order (ECF Doc. 5) are modified accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer