JACKSON v. BICK, 2:15-cv-2066 DB P. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20170925899
Visitors: 9
Filed: Sep. 21, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 21, 2017
Summary: ORDER DEBORAH BARNES , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file a response to defendant's motion to dismiss. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's September 18, 2017, motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 29) is granted; and 2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file and serve a response to defendant's motion to dismiss. Any reply shall be filed and served in accordance with Local Rule 230(1)
Summary: ORDER DEBORAH BARNES , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file a response to defendant's motion to dismiss. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's September 18, 2017, motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 29) is granted; and 2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file and serve a response to defendant's motion to dismiss. Any reply shall be filed and served in accordance with Local Rule 230(1)...
More
ORDER
DEBORAH BARNES, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file a response to defendant's motion to dismiss. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's September 18, 2017, motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 29) is granted; and
2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file and serve a response to defendant's motion to dismiss. Any reply shall be filed and served in accordance with Local Rule 230(1).
Source: Leagle
