Wright v. Berryhill, 1:17-cv-00271-EPG. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20171023d11
Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 18, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 18, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION & ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have a 35-day extension of time, from November 1, 2017 to December 6, 2017, to respond to Plaintiff's Opening Brief. All other dates in the Court's Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time. Defendant respectfully submits that good
Summary: STIPULATION & ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have a 35-day extension of time, from November 1, 2017 to December 6, 2017, to respond to Plaintiff's Opening Brief. All other dates in the Court's Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time. Defendant respectfully submits that good ..
More
STIPULATION & ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have a 35-day extension of time, from November 1, 2017 to December 6, 2017, to respond to Plaintiff's Opening Brief. All other dates in the Court's Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly.
This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time. Defendant respectfully submits that good cause exists for the requested extension because additional time is needed to review and evaluate the administrative record, to consider the issues raised in Plaintiff's Opening Brief, to accommodate counsel's competing workload demands, including an increase in the number of cases requiring briefing, and to determine whether options exist for settlement. Plaintiff does not oppose Defendant's request for an extension of time.
ORDER
Based on the above stipulation by the parties, Defendant shall have a 35-day extension of time, from November 1, 2017 to December 6, 2017, to respond to Plaintiff's Opening Brief. All other dates in the Court's Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
