Jurado v. U.S., 1:18-cv-00739-LJO-BAM (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180604641
Visitors: 24
Filed: Jun. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 01, 2018
Summary: ORDER RELATING CASES AND REASSIGNING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE STANLEY A. BOONE (ECF No. 5) STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . On May 31, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a complaint and notice of related case in this action. (ECF Nos. 1, 5.) Review of this action reveals that it is related under Local Rule 123 to the action entitled Laurino v. United States Postal Service, No. 1:18-cv-00636-LJO-SAB. The actions are based on the same underlying facts and involve overlapping questions of law and
Summary: ORDER RELATING CASES AND REASSIGNING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE STANLEY A. BOONE (ECF No. 5) STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . On May 31, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a complaint and notice of related case in this action. (ECF Nos. 1, 5.) Review of this action reveals that it is related under Local Rule 123 to the action entitled Laurino v. United States Postal Service, No. 1:18-cv-00636-LJO-SAB. The actions are based on the same underlying facts and involve overlapping questions of law and f..
More
ORDER RELATING CASES AND REASSIGNING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE STANLEY A. BOONE
(ECF No. 5)
STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge.
On May 31, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a complaint and notice of related case in this action. (ECF Nos. 1, 5.) Review of this action reveals that it is related under Local Rule 123 to the action entitled Laurino v. United States Postal Service, No. 1:18-cv-00636-LJO-SAB. The actions are based on the same underlying facts and involve overlapping questions of law and fact.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Office of the Clerk shall relate this case with case no. 1:18-cv-00636-LJO-SAB;
2. This case shall be assigned to the docket of United States Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone, and
3. The new case number shall be:
1:18-cv-00739-LJO-SAB
and all future pleadings and/or correspondence must be so numbered. The parties are advised that use of an incorrect case number, including initials, may result in a delay of documents being processed and copies thereof being correctly distributed and received by the appropriate judicial officer.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
