Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Harrison, CR 17-00156 JAM. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180717663 Visitors: 25
Filed: Jul. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 16, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the Government, through Assistant United States Attorney Samuel Wong, and Defendant Timothy Harrison, through his attorney Daniel Olmos, that the briefing schedule and hearing date for the anticipated defense motion to suppress be continued at the request of undersigned defense counsel. Defendant Harrison and the Gover
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the Government, through Assistant United States Attorney Samuel Wong, and Defendant Timothy Harrison, through his attorney Daniel Olmos, that the briefing schedule and hearing date for the anticipated defense motion to suppress be continued at the request of undersigned defense counsel.

Defendant Harrison and the Government previously agreed upon a briefing schedule for an anticipated defense motion to suppress, which was subsequently ordered by the Court, as follows: Defense motion to be filed no later than July 17, 2018, the Government's response to be filed no later than August 7, 2018, any reply to be filed by August 14, 2018, and a hearing date of August 28, 2018. See Docket No. 23. Due to unforeseen work obligations, undersigned defense counsel will be unable to file his opening brief by July 17, and the parties therefore stipulate to the following briefing schedule: Defense motion to be filed no later than July 31, 2018, the Government's response to be filed no later than August 21, 2018, any reply to be filed by August 28, 2018, and a hearing date (if necessary) of September 11, 2018.

The stipulated revised briefing schedule and hearing date will not affect the trial date of November 5, 2018. Time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act has previously been excluded through and including that date.

For the foregoing reasons, the parties stipulate to continue the briefing schedule and hearing date on any defense motion to suppress as described above.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer