Filed: Aug. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 01, 2018
Summary: STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (FRCP 41(a)(1)); ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . It is hereby stipulated, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by and between Plaintiff RANDALL THOMPSON, by and through his attorneys Eugene Chittock and Bret Cook; Defendants THOMAS BZOSKIE, M.D. and HARRY NEWMAN, M.D., by and through their attorney Shanan Hewitt; and Defendants CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and THOMAS ABREU, by and throu
Summary: STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (FRCP 41(a)(1)); ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . It is hereby stipulated, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by and between Plaintiff RANDALL THOMPSON, by and through his attorneys Eugene Chittock and Bret Cook; Defendants THOMAS BZOSKIE, M.D. and HARRY NEWMAN, M.D., by and through their attorney Shanan Hewitt; and Defendants CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and THOMAS ABREU, by and throug..
More
STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (FRCP 41(a)(1)); ORDER
KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.
It is hereby stipulated, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by and between Plaintiff RANDALL THOMPSON, by and through his attorneys Eugene Chittock and Bret Cook; Defendants THOMAS BZOSKIE, M.D. and HARRY NEWMAN, M.D., by and through their attorney Shanan Hewitt; and Defendants CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and THOMAS ABREU, by and through their attorney Michael Terhorst that Defendants THOMAS BZOSKIE, M.D., HARRY NEWMAN, M.D., and THOMAS ABREU are dismissed from this action with prejudice.
In consideration of the Stipulation entered by the above-named parties to the United States District Court Eastern District of California action, Randall Thompson v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al., Case No. 2:17-cv-02347-KJM-CKD, Defendants THOMAS BZOSKIE, M.D., HARRY NEWMAN, M.D., and THOMAS ABREU are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) with the parties mentioned herein to bear their own fees and costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
