Early v. Keystone Restaurant Group, LLC, 2:16-CV-00740 JAM-DB. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181009524
Visitors: 5
Filed: Sep. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 12, 2018
Summary: RESPONSE TO NOTE #2 FROM JURY JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . To find in favor of plaintiff on her Title VII retaliation claim you must find that her participation in a protected activity, in this case the reporting of harassment, was a reason for the termination ("the adverse employment action"), that is plaintiff was terminated because she reported the harassment and she would not have been terminated if she had not reported the harassment.
RESPONSE TO NOTE #2 FROM JURY
JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
To find in favor of plaintiff on her Title VII retaliation claim you must find that her participation in a protected activity, in this case the reporting of harassment, was a reason for the termination ("the adverse employment action"), that is plaintiff was terminated because she reported the harassment and she would not have been terminated if she had not reported the harassment.
Source: Leagle
