Johnson v. California Forensic Medical Group, 1:17-cv-00755-LJO-EPG (PC). (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181030861
Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER FOLLOWING STATUS CONFERENCE ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Aylwin Johnson, Jr. ("Plaintiff"), is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The Court held a telephonic discovery and status conference on October 26, 2018. Plaintiff appeared on behalf of himself, and Jerome Varanini appeared on behalf of Defendants. Potential pro bono counsel for Plaintiff, Sanjay Schmidt, also appeared. For th
Summary: ORDER FOLLOWING STATUS CONFERENCE ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Aylwin Johnson, Jr. ("Plaintiff"), is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The Court held a telephonic discovery and status conference on October 26, 2018. Plaintiff appeared on behalf of himself, and Jerome Varanini appeared on behalf of Defendants. Potential pro bono counsel for Plaintiff, Sanjay Schmidt, also appeared. For the..
More
ORDER FOLLOWING STATUS CONFERENCE
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
Aylwin Johnson, Jr. ("Plaintiff"), is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
The Court held a telephonic discovery and status conference on October 26, 2018. Plaintiff appeared on behalf of himself, and Jerome Varanini appeared on behalf of Defendants. Potential pro bono counsel for Plaintiff, Sanjay Schmidt, also appeared.
For the reasons stated on the record at the conference, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. Sanjay Schmidt has until November 8, 2018, to email the Court's courtroom deputy (mrooney@caed.uscourts.gov) and Mr. Varanini regarding whether he agreed to appointment as Plaintiff's pro bono counsel, and if so, for what purpose(s);
2. Defendants have fourteen days from the date of service of this order to produce to Plaintiff all documents Defendants have received from third parties that relate to the injury to Plaintiff's hand that is alleged in the complaint. Defendants do not need to produce any documents they have already produced.
3. The deadline for service of non-expert discovery requests is February 20, 2019.
4. The non-expert discovery cutoff is April 6, 2019.
5. The deadline to file dispositive motions is April 20, 2019.
6. The expert disclosure deadline is May 25, 2019.
7. The rebuttal expert disclosure deadline is June 22, 2019.
8. The expert discovery cutoff is July 27, 2019.
9. The deadline for the parties to file pretrial statements is October 5, 2019.
10. All other hearing dates and deadlines, including the trial date and the deadline for the parties to file motions for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses, remain the same.
11. As discussed extensively on the record, no extension will be given to these dates.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
