U.S. v. Wright, 1:06-cr-00048 DAD. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181221c79
Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 20, 2018
Summary: APPLICATION AND ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . Defendant, Mandel Wright, through the Federal Defender for the Eastern District of California, hereby requests appointment of counsel for the purpose of seeking early termination of his supervised release. Our office has a conflict. Mr. Wright previously had retained counsel, but submits the attached Financial Affidavit as evidence of his inability to retain counsel at this time. On October 1, 2007, defendant pled gu
Summary: APPLICATION AND ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . Defendant, Mandel Wright, through the Federal Defender for the Eastern District of California, hereby requests appointment of counsel for the purpose of seeking early termination of his supervised release. Our office has a conflict. Mr. Wright previously had retained counsel, but submits the attached Financial Affidavit as evidence of his inability to retain counsel at this time. On October 1, 2007, defendant pled gui..
More
APPLICATION AND ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL
DALE A. DROZD, District Judge.
Defendant, Mandel Wright, through the Federal Defender for the Eastern District of California, hereby requests appointment of counsel for the purpose of seeking early termination of his supervised release. Our office has a conflict.
Mr. Wright previously had retained counsel, but submits the attached Financial Affidavit as evidence of his inability to retain counsel at this time. On October 1, 2007, defendant pled guilty to Count 1 of the Indictment, namely, 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1) & 841(b)(1)(A) — Conspiracy to Distribute Cocaine. On February 4, 2008, defendant was sentenced to 120 months custody, 60 months supervised release, and $100 penalty assessment. On December 18, 2018, Mr. Wright presented himself in our office to inquire about early termination. Therefore, it is respectfully recommended that counsel be appointed to assist him.
ORDER
Having satisfied the Court that the defendant is financially unable to retain counsel, the Court hereby appoints counsel pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3006A.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
