ORDER RELATING CASES

WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.

Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that they are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123(a), because they involve many of the same parties, are based on the same underlying events, and present similar questions of fact and law. Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same judge is likely to effect a substantial saving of judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for the parties.

The parties should be aware that relating the cases under Local Rule 123 merely has the result that both actions are assigned to the same judge; no consolidation of the actions is effected. Under the regular practice of this court, related cases are generally assigned to the judge and magistrate judge to whom the first filed action was assigned.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the actions denominated Mitchell v. Imperato, 2:19-cv-297 WBS EFB, Imperato v. Mitchell, 2:19-cv-411 MCE KJN, Imperato v. Mitchell, 2:19-cv-412 TLN EFB, and City of Elk Grove v. Elk Grove Animal Rescue, 2:19-cv-439 TLN KJN be, and the same hereby are, deemed related. The cases denominated Imperato v. Mitchell, 2:19-cv-411 MCE KJN, Imperato v. Mitchell, 2:19-cv-412 TLN EFB, and City of Elk Grove v. Elk Grove Animal Rescue, 2:19-cv-439 TLN KJN be, shall be reassigned to the Honorable WILLIAM B. SHUBB. Any dates currently set in the reassigned cases only are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the captions on documents filed in the reassigned cases shall be shown as Imperato v. Mitchell, 2:19-cv-411 WBS EFB, Imperato v. Mitchell, 2:19-cv-412 WBS EFB, and City of Elk Grove v. Elk Grove Animal Rescue, 2:19-cv-439 WBS EFB.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make an appropriate adjustment in the assignment of cases to compensate for these reassignments.