Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Vargas v. Berryhill, 1:17-CV-1553 (JDP). (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190530a22 Visitors: 11
Filed: May 25, 2019
Latest Update: May 25, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEYS FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (28 U.S.C. 2412(d)) JEREMY D. PETERSON , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, subject to the approval of the Court, that Michelle Marie Vargas ("Plaintiff") be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. 2412(d), in the amount of six thousand seven hundred fifty-three dollars and
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEYS FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (28 U.S.C. §2412(d))

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, subject to the approval of the Court, that Michelle Marie Vargas ("Plaintiff") be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. §2412(d), in the amount of six thousand seven hundred fifty-three dollars and fifty-eight cents ($6,753.58). This represents compensation for legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §2412(d).

After the Court issues an Order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter of Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff's attorney. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the attorney fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the Order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.

Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt subject to offset, then the government shall cause the payment of fees approved to be made payable to Melissa Newel or Newel Law (collectively "Plaintiff's counsel"), pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any and all payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel.

This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA attorney fees and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under EAJA. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff's counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees and expenses in connection with this action.

This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff's counsel to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. §406(b), subject to the provisions of the EAJA. Respectfully submitted, Dated: May 17, 2019 NEWEL LAW By: Melissa Newel Melissa Newel Attorney for Plaintiff MICHELLE MARIE VARGAS Dated: May 20, 2019. McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney By: Ellinor R. Coder* ELLINOR R. CODER (*Authorized by email dated 05/20/2019) Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), fees in the amount of six thousand seven hundred fifty-three dollars and fifty-eight cents ($6,753.58) be awarded subject to the terms of the stipulation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer