Moores v. Berryhill, 2:17-cv-2334-EFB. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190530a90
Visitors: 15
Filed: May 29, 2019
Latest Update: May 29, 2019
Summary: ORDER EDMUND F. BRENNAN , District Judge . On March 29, 2019, the court denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, granted the Commissioner's cross-motion for summary judgment, and entered judgment accordingly. ECF Nos. 21 & 22. On May 28, 2019, plaintiff filed a notice of appeal (ECF No. 23) and, shortly thereafter, a request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (ECF No. 24). Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis satisfies the requirements of Rule 24(a) of the Fe
Summary: ORDER EDMUND F. BRENNAN , District Judge . On March 29, 2019, the court denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, granted the Commissioner's cross-motion for summary judgment, and entered judgment accordingly. ECF Nos. 21 & 22. On May 28, 2019, plaintiff filed a notice of appeal (ECF No. 23) and, shortly thereafter, a request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (ECF No. 24). Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis satisfies the requirements of Rule 24(a) of the Fed..
More
ORDER
EDMUND F. BRENNAN, District Judge.
On March 29, 2019, the court denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, granted the Commissioner's cross-motion for summary judgment, and entered judgment accordingly. ECF Nos. 21 & 22. On May 28, 2019, plaintiff filed a notice of appeal (ECF No. 23) and, shortly thereafter, a request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (ECF No. 24).
Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis satisfies the requirements of Rule 24(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (ECF No. 24) is granted. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Source: Leagle
