Stevenson v. Holland, 1:16-cv-01831-AWI-JLT. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190613986
Visitors: 19
Filed: Jun. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2019
Summary: ORDER AFTER IN CAMERA REVIEW (Doc. 57) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . At the request of counsel, the Court has conducted an in camera review of documents produced to the Court, which are responsive to production requests. The Court will order production of some of the records. In doing so, the Court makes no comment as to the admissibility of these documents nor does it make any finding that the privileges asserted may not be asserted at trial. The Court ORDERS the defendants
Summary: ORDER AFTER IN CAMERA REVIEW (Doc. 57) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . At the request of counsel, the Court has conducted an in camera review of documents produced to the Court, which are responsive to production requests. The Court will order production of some of the records. In doing so, the Court makes no comment as to the admissibility of these documents nor does it make any finding that the privileges asserted may not be asserted at trial. The Court ORDERS the defendants ..
More
ORDER AFTER IN CAMERA REVIEW
(Doc. 57)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
At the request of counsel, the Court has conducted an in camera review of documents produced to the Court, which are responsive to production requests. The Court will order production of some of the records. In doing so, the Court makes no comment as to the admissibility of these documents nor does it make any finding that the privileges asserted may not be asserted at trial.
The Court ORDERS the defendants to disclose the following redacted1 documents:
1. Documents with Bates numbers 250-287, 327-338, 386-423, 427-428, 442, 444, 455.
Despite its earlier order, the Court DECLINES to maintain the records that it has not ordered to be disclosed. Rather, the defense SHALL maintain them and produce them, if ordered, for purposes of appeal.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Redaction should occur to obliterate the personal identifiers of witnesses and complainants as well as the identifiers of other involved correctional staff.
Source: Leagle
