American International Industries v. Stiles, 2:19-cv-01218-WBS-EFB. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190806952
Visitors: 3
Filed: Aug. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 02, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT BY 28 DAYS (FIRST EXTENSION) WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT BY 28 DAYS (FIRST EXTENSION) WHEREAS Defendant Sharidan Stiles was served with the Complaint in this matter on July 15, 2019, such that Defendant's response to the Complaint is presently due on Monday, August 5, 2019; and WHEREAS Counsel for Defendant has prescheduled work and travel commitments i
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT BY 28 DAYS (FIRST EXTENSION) WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT BY 28 DAYS (FIRST EXTENSION) WHEREAS Defendant Sharidan Stiles was served with the Complaint in this matter on July 15, 2019, such that Defendant's response to the Complaint is presently due on Monday, August 5, 2019; and WHEREAS Counsel for Defendant has prescheduled work and travel commitments in..
More
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT BY 28 DAYS (FIRST EXTENSION)
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT BY 28 DAYS (FIRST EXTENSION)
WHEREAS Defendant Sharidan Stiles was served with the Complaint in this matter on July 15, 2019, such that Defendant's response to the Complaint is presently due on Monday, August 5, 2019; and
WHEREAS Counsel for Defendant has prescheduled work and travel commitments in early August; and
WHEREAS Local Rule 144 provides that the parties may stipulate to an extension of no more than 28 days to respond to the Complaint; and
WHEREAS no other extension of time to respond to the Complaint has been sought or obtained in this case;
THE PARTIES STIPULATE THAT DEFENDANT SHARIDAN STILES SHALL HAVE AN ADDITIONAL 28 DAYS TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT, SUCH THAT DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE SHALL BE DUE SEPTEMBER 2, 2019.1
Dated: August 2, 2019. Respectfully submitted,
Pierce Bainbridge Beck Price & Hecht LLP
By:/s/Brian J. Dunne
Brian Dunne
Attorneys for Defendant Sharidan Stiles
Dated: August 2, 2019. Respectfully submitted,
CONKLE, KREMER & ENGEL PC
By:/s/
Zachary Page
Attorneys for Plaintiff American
International Industries, Inc.
ORDER
Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. Defendant should answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before Monday, September 2, 2019.
FootNotes
1. This document is being filed through the Court's ECF System. Counsel for Defendant attests that (1) the content of this document is acceptable to all persons required to sign it; (2) Plaintiff's counsel has concurred with the filing of this document; and (3) a record supporting said concurrence is available if so ordered.
Source: Leagle
