United States v. Lester, 1:14-cr-00236-DAD-BAM-1. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190821950
Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 20, 2019
Summary: ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND DIRECTING GOVERNMENT TO RESPOND DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . Defendant Anthony Lester filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct a sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255. (Doc. No. 129.) The court has screened the motion pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 and 2255 Cases, and the government is ordered to respond to the motion. Within 45 days of electronic service of this order, the government shall file and serve a response to the pen
Summary: ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND DIRECTING GOVERNMENT TO RESPOND DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . Defendant Anthony Lester filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct a sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255. (Doc. No. 129.) The court has screened the motion pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 and 2255 Cases, and the government is ordered to respond to the motion. Within 45 days of electronic service of this order, the government shall file and serve a response to the pend..
More
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND DIRECTING GOVERNMENT TO RESPOND
DALE A. DROZD, District Judge.
Defendant Anthony Lester filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct a sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (Doc. No. 129.) The court has screened the motion pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 and 2255 Cases, and the government is ordered to respond to the motion. Within 45 days of electronic service of this order, the government shall file and serve a response to the pending § 2255 motion. Defendant will have 30 days to file a reply to the government's response.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
