Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Horn v. Rise Medical Staffing, LLC, 2:17-cv-01967-MCE-KJN. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190830912 Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 28, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . On July 1, 2019, Plaintiffs Annette Horn, Tekary Wright, and Lisa Delgado ("Plaintiffs"), individually and on behalf of the proposed class, moved the Court for an order granting preliminary approval of a class action settlement of claims against defendants Rise Medical Staffing, LLC and Advanced Medical Personnel Services, Inc. ("Defendants"). ECF No. 57. Thereafter, on Augu
More

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

On July 1, 2019, Plaintiffs Annette Horn, Tekary Wright, and Lisa Delgado ("Plaintiffs"), individually and on behalf of the proposed class, moved the Court for an order granting preliminary approval of a class action settlement of claims against defendants Rise Medical Staffing, LLC and Advanced Medical Personnel Services, Inc. ("Defendants"). ECF No. 57. Thereafter, on August 7, 2019, Defendants filed a Notice of Non-Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion. ECF No. 61. Given that non-opposition, having carefully considered the motion along with its supporting papers, and good cause appearing, the Court will GRANT the motion. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS as follows:

1. The Court preliminarily finds that the terms of the Class Action Settlement Agreement ("Settlement") are fair, reasonable, and adequate, and comply with Rule 23(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 2. The following proposed class ("Settlement Class") is conditionally certified for purposes of the Settlement only: All non-exempt hourly healthcare professionals employed by Rise Medical Staffing, LLC and/or Advanced Medical Personnel Services, Inc. to work one or more assignments in California from September 21, 2013 through February 28, 2018 who received overtime pay and had the value of per diem benefits and/or monetary bonuses received during the assignment(s) excluded from their regular rate for purposes of calculating overtime pay. 3. The Court appoints Plaintiffs as the representative of the Settlement Class.

4. The Court appoints Hayes Pawlenko LLP and Blumenthal, Nordrehaug, Bhowmik, De Blouw LLP as class counsel for the Settlement Class.

5. The proposed manner of the notice of settlement set forth in the Settlement constitutes the best notice practicable under the circumstances and complies with the requirement of due process.

6. The Court approves the form, substance, and requirements of the notice of settlement attached as Exhibit A to the Settlement.

7. The parties shall carry out the notice process according to the terms of the Settlement.

8. The Court appoints ILYM Group, Inc. as the settlement administrator, preliminarily approves settlement administration costs of up to $20,000, and, in accordance with the Settlement, directs the settlement administrator to complete dissemination of the notice of settlement within 30 days of entry of this Order.

9. A final approval (fairness) hearing is hereby set for January 9, 2020, at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 7 to consider the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the Settlement as well as the award of attorneys' fees and costs to class counsel, and incentive awards to the class representatives.

10. Class counsel shall file the motion for an award of attorneys' fees and costs and incentive awards twenty-one (21) days after the settlement administrator disseminates the notice of settlement.

11. Class counsel shall file the motion for final approval of the Settlement, along with any objections to the Settlement and any responses thereto, no later than twenty-eight (28) days before the final approval (fairness) hearing. Defendants may also file a memorandum in support of final approval of the Settlement or in response to objections no later than fourteen (14) days before the final approval (fairness) hearing.

12. All proceedings in this action, other than proceedings necessary to carry out or enforce the Settlement or this Order, are stayed pending the final fairness hearing and the Court's decision whether to grant final approval of the Settlement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer