Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Real Property located at 4343 North Forty, Lincoln, California, Placer County, 2:18-CV-00808-KJM-CKD. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20191011f78 Visitors: 3
Filed: Oct. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 07, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND WITHDRAWAL OF VERIFIED CLAIM AND ANSWER OF LIENHOLDER KHOI D. VO KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between claimant, Khoi D. Vo ("Claimant"), and Plaintiff, the United States of America ("Plaintiff"), by and through its undersigned counsel, Kevin C. Khasigian, Assistant U.S. Attorney, as follows: 1. Claimant asserted a lienholder interest in the defendant property located at 5371 Ontario Street, Sacramento, California, Sacramento County,
More

STIPULATION AND WITHDRAWAL OF VERIFIED CLAIM AND ANSWER OF LIENHOLDER KHOI D. VO

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between claimant, Khoi D. Vo ("Claimant"), and Plaintiff, the United States of America ("Plaintiff"), by and through its undersigned counsel, Kevin C. Khasigian, Assistant U.S. Attorney, as follows:

1. Claimant asserted a lienholder interest in the defendant property located at 5371 Ontario Street, Sacramento, California, Sacramento County, APN: 023-0275-015-0000 ("Defendant Ontario Street").

2. The loan has since been satisfied and Claimant no longer has an interest in the Defendant Ontario Street property.

3. Accordingly, Claimant hereby withdraws his claim filed May 25, 2018 [Dk. 20] and his answer filed June 22, 2018 [Dk. 34] in the above-captioned case with respect to the Defendant Ontario Street property.

4. To the extent required under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a), Plaintiff agrees to dismiss with prejudice Claimant in the above-captioned case pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a). Defendant Ontario Street property is the in rem defendant.

5. Each party hereto is to bear its own costs.

6. Claimant is hereby removed from the Service List for the above-captioned case.

Dated: 9/30/2019 By: /s/Khoi D. Vo KHOI D. VO (Signature retained by AUSA Khasigian) Dated: 10/1/2019 McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney By: /s/Kevin C. Khasigian KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

The Court has read and considered the Stipulation of Withdrawal of Claim and Answer by Khoi D. Vo ("the Stipulation") by Claimant, Khoi D. Vo ("Claimant"), and Plaintiff, United States of America ("Plaintiff"), by and through their respective counsel (collectively, the "Parties"). For the reasons stated in the Stipulation and for good cause shown,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. The Stipulation is approved.

2. Claimant's claim filed May 25, 2018 [Dk. 20] and answer filed June 22, 2018 [Dk. 34] in the above-captioned case are hereby deemed withdrawn.

3. Claimant is hereby deemed dismissed from the above-captioned case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer