Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Beinlick v. Pace, 2:17-CV-0824-WBS-DMC. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20191101g29 Visitors: 14
Filed: Oct. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 30, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this civil rights action. An initial status/scheduling conference was held in this matter on October 9, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned in Redding, California. Plaintiff's counsel failed to appear. Steven Edward Vong, Esq., appeared telephonically for defendant. Upon consideration of the status reports on file in this action, discussion with the parties, and good cause appearing
More

ORDER

Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this civil rights action. An initial status/scheduling conference was held in this matter on October 9, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned in Redding, California. Plaintiff's counsel failed to appear. Steven Edward Vong, Esq., appeared telephonically for defendant.

Upon consideration of the status reports on file in this action, discussion with the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, the court will, by this order, set a schedule pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b).

1. The parties have indicated that initial disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) and (f) were exchanged on October 23, 2019;

2. The parties shall exchange lists of expert witnesses no later than August 10, 2020, and expert reports shall be exchanged no later than September 9, 2020. Such disclosures must be made pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(A) and (B). The parties are reminded of their obligation to supplement these disclosures when required under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(e). Failure to comply with these requirements may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, which may include the preclusion of testimony or other evidence offered through the expert witness;

3. Non-expert discovery shall be completed, and all motions pertaining to non-expert discovery shall be noticed to be heard, by July 9, 2020, and expert discovery shall be completed, and all motions pertaining to expert discovery shall be noticed to be heard by, October 26, 2020;

4. By separate order issued herewith, the court will set a settlement conference before the undersigned on November 12, 2020, in Sacramento, California, subject to the parties' waiver of disqualification;

5. All other pre-trial motions, including dispositive motions, shall be noticed to be heard by January 27, 2021;

6. The pre-trial conference is set for March 15, 2021, at 1:30 p.m., before the Honorable William B. Schubb in Sacramento, California. Separate pre-trial statements shall be filed pursuant to Local Rule 281; and

7. Jury trial of this matter, expected to last four days, is set to commence on May 25, 2021, at 9:00 a.m., before the Honorable William B. Schubb in Sacramento, California. The parties shall file trial briefs pursuant to Local Rule 285.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer