Filed: Nov. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. On September 5, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified therein. ECF No.
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. On September 5, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified therein. ECF No. 7..
More
ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., District Judge.
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules.
On September 5, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified therein. ECF No. 78. Timely objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. ECF No. 80.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304(f), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed September 5, 2019 (ECF No. 78), are ADOPTED in full;
2. Defendant Linggi is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim;
3. Defendant Lynch's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 68) is GRANTED; and
4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
