Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Grandy v. California, 2:19-cv-00774-MCE-KJN. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20191122a35 Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . On September 25, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 11), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207 , 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conc
More

ORDER

On September 25, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 11), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed.

Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 11) are ADOPTED in full;

2. Defendants' motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 6, 7) are GRANTED;

3. The action is DISMISSED with prejudice; and

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer