Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

E.digital Corporation v. Research in Motion Limited, 14-1236 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Number: 14-1236 Visitors: 14
Filed: Mar. 27, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-1236 Document: 19 Page: 1 Filed: 03/27/2014 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit _ E.DIGITAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE (USA) INC., PANTECH WIRELESS, INC., PANTECH CO. LTD., AND WOODMAN LABS, INC., Defendants-Appellees. _ 2014-1239, -1242, -1243 _ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in No. 3:13-cv-00781-DMS- WVG, Judge Dana M. Sabraw. - E.DIGITAL CORPOR
More
Case: 14-1236 Document: 19 Page: 1 Filed: 03/27/2014 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ E.DIGITAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE (USA) INC., PANTECH WIRELESS, INC., PANTECH CO. LTD., AND WOODMAN LABS, INC., Defendants-Appellees. ______________________ 2014-1239, -1242, -1243 ______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in No. 3:13-cv-00781-DMS- WVG, Judge Dana M. Sabraw. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- E.DIGITAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED, DBA BLACKBERRY, AND RESEARCH IN MOTION CORPORATION, DBA BLACKBERRY., Defendants-Appellees. ______________________ 2014-1236 Case: 14-1236 Document: 19 Page: 2 Filed: 03/27/2014 2 E.DIGITAL CORPORATION v. RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in No. 3:13-cv-00781-DMS- WVG, Judge Dana M. Sabraw. ______________________ ON MOTION ______________________ ORDER Upon consideration of e.Digital Corporation’s unop- posed motion to withdraw appeal no. 2014-1236, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. Appeal No. 2014-1236 is dismissed. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs in Appeal No. 2014-1236. (3) The revised official caption for 2014-1239, -1242, -1243 is reflected above. FOR THE COURT /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court s19 ISSUED AS A MANDATE (as to 2014-1236 only): March 27, 2014
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer