LEVY v. ZUCKERBERG, 12-cv-03642-MMC. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20120731b29
Visitors: 31
Filed: Jul. 31, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 31, 2012
Summary: ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ORDER ADMITTING DAVID R. SCOTT PRO HAC VICE MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge. David R. Scott, whose business address and telephone number are Scott+Scott LLP, 156 South Main Street, Colchester, CT 06415, (860) 537-5534, and who is an active member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Connecticut and the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, having applied for admission to practice in the Northern District of California on a pro
Summary: ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ORDER ADMITTING DAVID R. SCOTT PRO HAC VICE MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge. David R. Scott, whose business address and telephone number are Scott+Scott LLP, 156 South Main Street, Colchester, CT 06415, (860) 537-5534, and who is an active member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Connecticut and the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, having applied for admission to practice in the Northern District of California on a pro h..
More
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ORDER ADMITTING DAVID R. SCOTT PRO HAC VICE
MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.
David R. Scott, whose business address and telephone number are Scott+Scott LLP, 156 South Main Street, Colchester, CT 06415, (860) 537-5534, and who is an active member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Connecticut and the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, having applied for admission to practice in the Northern District of California on a pro hac vice basis representing Plaintiff Lidia Levy;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application is granted, subject to the terms and conditions on Civil Local Rule 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate appearance pro hac vice. Services of papers upon and communication with co-counsel designated in the application will constitute notice to the party. All future filings in this action are subject to the requirements contained in General Order No. 45, Electronic Case Filing.
Source: Leagle
