CALKIN v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, C 12-02584 JCS. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20121120964
Visitors: 13
Filed: Oct. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Oct. 26, 2012
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE DATE AND PROPOSED ORDER ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, Magistrate Judge. IT IS STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES AS FOLLOWS: 1) A Settlement Conference is currently set for November 9, 2012. 2) The parties anticipate completing limited discovery pertaining to certain liability and damages issues necessary for effective settlement discussions by the end of November 2012. 3) The parties also anticipate that a decision will be issued in a California Court of Appeal
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE DATE AND PROPOSED ORDER ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, Magistrate Judge. IT IS STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES AS FOLLOWS: 1) A Settlement Conference is currently set for November 9, 2012. 2) The parties anticipate completing limited discovery pertaining to certain liability and damages issues necessary for effective settlement discussions by the end of November 2012. 3) The parties also anticipate that a decision will be issued in a California Court of Appeal ..
More
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE DATE AND PROPOSED ORDER
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES AS FOLLOWS:
1) A Settlement Conference is currently set for November 9, 2012.
2) The parties anticipate completing limited discovery pertaining to certain liability and damages issues necessary for effective settlement discussions by the end of November 2012.
3) The parties also anticipate that a decision will be issued in a California Court of Appeal case (Lui v. City and County of San Francisco, Case No. A131882) involving the City and County of San Francisco and similar issues raised in this case relating to disability claims brought by disabled police officers under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act. Defendant anticipates that the ruling in the Lui decision will inform and affect its settlement position in this case.
4) The parties stipulate to continuing the Settlement Conference to a date in December 2012 and request that the Court enter an order consistent with this stipulation.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
The Settlement Conference set for November 9, 2012, at 9:30 a.m. is continued to the date of _________ at ________.
Source: Leagle
