Filed: Oct. 16, 2013
Latest Update: Oct. 16, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE PURSUANT TO FRCP 6(B) AND NORTHERN DISTRICT CIVIL LOCAL RULES 6-1, 6-3, 7-10 AND 7-11 [MDL Dkt. Nos. 8606, 8611, 8610, 8612, 8653] SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge. WHEREAS Defendant HannStar Display Corporation ("HannStar") engaged Latham & Watkins LLP on October 10, 2013 to replace Freitas Tseng & Kaufman LLP as its counsel of record in this matter and has filed a Motion to Substitute Counsel concurrently herewith; WHEREA
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE PURSUANT TO FRCP 6(B) AND NORTHERN DISTRICT CIVIL LOCAL RULES 6-1, 6-3, 7-10 AND 7-11 [MDL Dkt. Nos. 8606, 8611, 8610, 8612, 8653] SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge. WHEREAS Defendant HannStar Display Corporation ("HannStar") engaged Latham & Watkins LLP on October 10, 2013 to replace Freitas Tseng & Kaufman LLP as its counsel of record in this matter and has filed a Motion to Substitute Counsel concurrently herewith; WHEREAS..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE PURSUANT TO FRCP 6(B) AND NORTHERN DISTRICT CIVIL LOCAL RULES 6-1, 6-3, 7-10 AND 7-11
[MDL Dkt. Nos. 8606, 8611, 8610, 8612, 8653]
SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.
WHEREAS Defendant HannStar Display Corporation ("HannStar") engaged Latham & Watkins LLP on October 10, 2013 to replace Freitas Tseng & Kaufman LLP as its counsel of record in this matter and has filed a Motion to Substitute Counsel concurrently herewith;
WHEREAS HannStar seeks an extension of certain upcoming briefing deadlines and dates to allow Latham & Watkins sufficient time to assume its new role as HannStar's counsel;
WHEREAS counsel for HannStar and counsel for Plaintiffs Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Purchasing LLC, Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc., Best Buy Stores, L.P., Best Buy.com, L.L.C., and Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc. ("the Best Buy Plaintiffs") have met and conferred and agree that an extension of certain deadlines and dates would be appropriate;
WHEREAS the schedule proposed below will result in the parties' related submissions being filed at least nine days in advance of the proposed new hearing on these matters; and
WHEREAS HannStar has agreed to forebear from making any further requests for information (discovery) to or asserting any entitlement to further information (discovery) from the Best Buy Plaintiffs other than in HannStar's (a) opposition to the Best Buy Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs and (b) opposition to the Best Buy Plaintiffs' Bill of Costs. Further, the parties agree that nothing in this Stipulation shall be construed as an admission by either party as to the relevance of this information, nor shall anything in this Stipulation affect or alter the burden of proof applicable to the pending motions;
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the parties that the following schedule should be adopted:
Event Previous Date New Date
HannStar's Opposition to the Best Buy October 16, 2013 October 30, 2013
Plaintiffs' Motion for Fees and Costs
The Best Buy Plaintiffs' Opposition to
HannStar's Motion for Judgment as a October 16, 2013 October 30, 2013
Matter of Law
HannStar's Opposition to the Best Buy October 21, 2013 November 4, 2013
Plaintiffs' Bill of Costs
HannStar's Reply ISO Motion for October 23, 2013 November 13, 2013
Judgment as a Matter of Law
The Best Buy Plaintiffs' Reply ISO Motion October 30, 2013 November 13, 2013
for Fees and Costs
The Best Buy Plaintiffs' Reply ISO Bill of November 4, 2013 November 13, 2013
Costs
Hearing of the Following Motions:
1. The Best Buy Plaintiffs' Motion for
Fees and Costs (MDL Dkt. No. 8610)
2. The Best Buy Plaintiffs' Bill of Costs
(MDL Dkt. No. 8612)
3. The Best Buy Plaintiffs' Motion to November 22, 2013
Amend the September 4, 2013
Judgment Against HannStar to Reflect November 15, 2013 (or such other date the
Treble Damages (MDL Dkt. No. 8611) Court may choose)
4. HannStar's Motion to Vacate Judgment
Pursuant to FRCP 60(b) (MDL Dkt.
No. 8606)
5. HannStar's Motion for Judgment as a
Matter of Law Pursuant to FRCP 50(b)
(MDL Dkt. No. 8653)
IT IS SO ORDERED.
