Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SEPEHRY-FARD v. DEPARTMENT STORES NATIONAL BANK, CV 13-03131 WHO. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20131126a47 Visitors: 20
Filed: Nov. 22, 2013
Latest Update: Nov. 22, 2013
Summary: NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANC E BY DEFENDANTS DEPARTMENT STORES NATIONAL BANK AND CITIBANK, N.A., AND ORDER WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge. Defendants Department Stores National Bank and Citibank N.A., successor in interest to Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. (together "Defendants"), hereby request permission for attorney Marcos D. Sasso to appear telephonically at the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, set for December 11, 2013, at 2:00 p.m., in Court
More

NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANC E BY DEFENDANTS DEPARTMENT STORES NATIONAL BANK AND CITIBANK, N.A., AND ORDER

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.

Defendants Department Stores National Bank and Citibank N.A., successor in interest to Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. (together "Defendants"), hereby request permission for attorney Marcos D. Sasso to appear telephonically at the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, set for December 11, 2013, at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 2 of the United States District Court, Northern District of California.

Counsel for Defendants resides in Los Angeles, California, and permission to appear telephonically would reduce the burden and expense on counsel by eliminating the need to travel to and from San Francisco, California.

ORDER

Pursuant to the request for telephonic appearance, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer