ARCZAR LLC v. SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA LLC, 3:13-cv-02671-WHO. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20140108816
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Jan. 07, 2014
Summary: ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge. Before the Court is the Parties' Joint Motion to Extend Deadlines. Having considered the Parties' Joint Motion and all pleadings and other papers in support thereof; and any further argument or evidence presented by the parties; the Court concludes that good cause exists for the Parties' Joint Motion. The Court therefore ORDERS that: • The deadline to serve Plaintiff's Amended Preliminary Infringement Contentio
Summary: ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge. Before the Court is the Parties' Joint Motion to Extend Deadlines. Having considered the Parties' Joint Motion and all pleadings and other papers in support thereof; and any further argument or evidence presented by the parties; the Court concludes that good cause exists for the Parties' Joint Motion. The Court therefore ORDERS that: • The deadline to serve Plaintiff's Amended Preliminary Infringement Contention..
More
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Parties' Joint Motion to Extend Deadlines. Having considered the Parties' Joint Motion and all pleadings and other papers in support thereof; and any further argument or evidence presented by the parties; the Court concludes that good cause exists for the Parties' Joint Motion. The Court therefore ORDERS that:
• The deadline to serve Plaintiff's Amended Preliminary Infringement Contentions in compliance with Patent L.R. 3-1 and 3-2 is January 24, 2013.
• The deadline to serve Defendant's Preliminary Invalidity Contentions under Patent Local Rules 3-3 and 3-4 (currently set for December 20, 2013) is 30 days following Plaintiffs' service of Preliminary Infringement Contentions that comply with Patent L.R. 3-1, which under the current schedule is February 24, 2014.
• The other deadlines in the case be reset to maintain the orderly progression of the case contemplated by Patent Local Rules, consistent with this Court's previous scheduling order:
Event Proposed Date
Parties exchange proposed terms for construction 3/10/14 (per P.L.R. 4-1)
Parties exchange preliminary claim constructions and 3/31/14 (per P.L.R. 4-2)
extrinsic evidence
Parties file Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing 4/25/14 (per P.L.R. 4-3)
Statement
Parties complete Claim Construction Discovery 5/27/14 (per P.L.R. 4-4)
Plaintiffs file Claim Construction Brief 6/9/14 (per P.L.R. 4-5(a))
Defendant files Claim Construction Brief 6/23/14 (per P.L.R. 4-5(b))
Plaintiffs file Reply Claim Construction Brief 7/7/14 (per P.L.R. 4-5(b))
Claim Construction Hearing To be set by the Court
Production of documents related to advice of counsel 50 days after Claim
Construction Order (per
P.L.R. 3-7)
Parties complete Fact Discovery 90 days after Claim
Construction Order
Parties designate experts and serve initial reports on 30 days after completion of
issues for which party bears the burden of proof Fact Discovery
Parties serve rebuttal reports 30 days after deadline to
designate initial expert reports
Parties complete Expert Discovery 30 days after deadline for
rebuttal reports
Deadline to File Dispositive Motions To be set by the Court
Pretrial Conference To be set after Claim
Construction Order
Trial To be set after Claim
Construction Order
IT IS SO ORDERED modified as follows:
The proposed dates above are accepted. The Claim Construction hearing shall be set at 9 a.m. on August 29, 2014 in Courtroom 12, 19th floor. A tutorial will occur at 9 a.m. on August 22, 2014, also in Courtroom 12. The Court will schedule a further Case Management Conference to set additional dates after issuing the Claim Construction Order.
Source: Leagle
