SMITH v. PROCTER & GAMBLE CO., 3:12-cv-00557-EDL. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20140502h65
Visitors: 13
Filed: Apr. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 21, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, District Judge. Plaintiff Cherish M. Smith and Defendant The Procter & Gamble Company (collectively, the "Parties"), through their duly authorized undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that this case be dismissed with prejudice. On January 30, 2013, the Parties filed a Joint Stipulation for Stay Pending Final Approval of Settlement Agreement ("Stipulation"), which stipulated that upon f
Summary: STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, District Judge. Plaintiff Cherish M. Smith and Defendant The Procter & Gamble Company (collectively, the "Parties"), through their duly authorized undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that this case be dismissed with prejudice. On January 30, 2013, the Parties filed a Joint Stipulation for Stay Pending Final Approval of Settlement Agreement ("Stipulation"), which stipulated that upon fi..
More
STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Cherish M. Smith and Defendant The Procter & Gamble Company (collectively, the "Parties"), through their duly authorized undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that this case be dismissed with prejudice. On January 30, 2013, the Parties filed a Joint Stipulation for Stay Pending Final Approval of Settlement Agreement ("Stipulation"), which stipulated that upon final approval of a nationwide class action settlement agreement in a substantially similar action in federal court in the District of New Jersey, Rossi v. The Procter & Gamble Company, Case No. 2:11-cv-07238-JLL-MAH (D.N.J.), this case should be dismissed with prejudice. The Rossi Court granted final approval on October 3, 2013, and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the sole objector's appeal on March 21, 2014. Wherefore, the Parties now request that this case be dismissed with prejudice as contemplated in the Parties' Stipulation.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
