Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

JENKINS v. CITY OF RICHMOND, C 08-03401 EMC. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140513817 Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 10, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS OF PICKETT WITH PREJUDICE EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. Shawn Pickett and the City of Richmond (hereinafter referred to as the "City") do hereby stipulate and agree as follows: Shawn Pickett and the City do hereby stipulate and agree, by and through their respective counsel, that all claims and causes of action asserted by Shawn Pickett in the instant case be dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Pro
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS OF PICKETT WITH PREJUDICE

EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

Shawn Pickett and the City of Richmond (hereinafter referred to as the "City") do hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

Shawn Pickett and the City do hereby stipulate and agree, by and through their respective counsel, that all claims and causes of action asserted by Shawn Pickett in the instant case be dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and in accordance with the terms of Settlement Agreement entered into between the parties. Shawn Pickett and the City shall each bear their own attorneys' fees and costs in connection with the above-captioned case.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation between Shawn Pickett and the City, the Court hereby dismissed, with prejudice, all claims and causes of action asserted by Shawn Pickett in Case No. C-08-03401 EMC.

IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer