Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Oliver, CR 14-00129-JST. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140606b11 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jun. 05, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 05, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE; [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE AND EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT JON S. TIGAR, District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties to this action, that the STATUS HEARING date of June 6, 2014 presently scheduled at 9:30 a.m., before the Jon Honorable John S. Tigar, be vacated and re-set for July 11, 2014 at 9:30 a.m. for STATUS HEARING. The reason for this request is that defense counsel is continuing to review, organize, and investig
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE; [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE AND EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties to this action, that the STATUS HEARING date of June 6, 2014 presently scheduled at 9:30 a.m., before the Jon Honorable John S. Tigar, be vacated and re-set for July 11, 2014 at 9:30 a.m. for STATUS HEARING.

The reason for this request is that defense counsel is continuing to review, organize, and investigate discovery in this case. The government did provide the discovery referenced in a previous stipulation and the defense has not yet reviewed it. Furthermore, Mr. Oliver has recently arrived at the NewBridge Foundation to begin inpatient substance dependancy treatment, and defense counsel prefers not to schedule Mr. Oliver for numerous matters outside of the treatment facility.

The parties agree and stipulate that the time until July 11, 2014 should be excluded, under 18 U.S.C. §3161(H)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), because the ends of justice served by the granting of the continuance outweigh the bests interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy and public trial. The continuance is necessary to accommodate counsel's preparation efforts.

Roger Dinh, Special Assistant United States Attorney.

ORDER

The court finds that the ends of justice served by the granting of the continuance outweigh the bests interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy and public trial. The continuance is necessary to accommodate counsel's preparation efforts including the review, organization, and investigation of discovery, as well as the provision of discovery by the government. Based on these findings, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the above-captioned matter be continued to July 11, 2014 at 9:30 a.m., and that time be excluded from the date of this order to July 11, 2014 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer