Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Katz v. County of Contra Costa, C 11-05771 CRB. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140711962 Visitors: 19
Filed: Jul. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 10, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [F.R.C.P. RULE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between all parties, through their designated counsel, as follows: STIPULATION Plaintiff Mitchell Katz ("Plaintiff") and Defendant County of Contra Costa, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate as follows: Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, including all causes of action asserted therein, is dismissed with prejudice as to D
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [F.R.C.P. RULE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)]

CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between all parties, through their designated counsel, as follows:

STIPULATION

Plaintiff Mitchell Katz ("Plaintiff") and Defendant County of Contra Costa, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate as follows: Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, including all causes of action asserted therein, is dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant County of Contra Costa only, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Plaintiff and Defendant County of Contra Costa will bear their own attorneys' fees and costs in connection with this action.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

Pursuant to the above Stipulation, Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint as to Defendant County of Contra Costa only is hereby dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Plaintiff and Defendant County of Contra Costa will bear their own attorneys' fees and costs in connection with this dismissal.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer