BOVINO v. INCASE DESIGNS, CORP., 3:14-cv-02105-VC. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20140718801
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jul. 17, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 17, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge. STIPULATION Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 1. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Mediation, with a mediator appointed from the Court's ADR panel (ADR L.R. 6); and 2. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: November 10, 2014. [PROPOSED] ORDER T
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge. STIPULATION Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 1. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Mediation, with a mediator appointed from the Court's ADR panel (ADR L.R. 6); and 2. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: November 10, 2014. [PROPOSED] ORDER Th..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.
STIPULATION
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
1. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Mediation, with a mediator appointed from the Court's ADR panel (ADR L.R. 6); and
2. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: November 10, 2014.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
