Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Freeman v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 4:13-cv-04179-JSW/JCS. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150212666 Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 11, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 11, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE FILING OF PLAINTIFF'S CORRECTED AMENDED INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS PURSUANT TO PATENT L.R. 3-6 JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge. Plaintiff Albert John Freeman and Defendant Delta Air Lines, Inc. hereby consent and stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, On January 12, 2015, this Court entered an order [Doc 92] permitting Plaintiff to serve amended infringement contentions, pursuant to a stipulation between the parties [Doc 91]; WHEREAS, Plaintiff seeks to serve
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE FILING OF PLAINTIFF'S CORRECTED AMENDED INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS PURSUANT TO PATENT L.R. 3-6

JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge.

Plaintiff Albert John Freeman and Defendant Delta Air Lines, Inc. hereby consent and stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, On January 12, 2015, this Court entered an order [Doc 92] permitting Plaintiff to serve amended infringement contentions, pursuant to a stipulation between the parties [Doc 91];

WHEREAS, Plaintiff seeks to serve Corrected Amended Infringement Contentions, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, because plaintiff's counsel Victoria E. Brieant inadvertently omitted the infringement contentions for Claims 26 and 29 in the filing with Doc 91 and in the subsequent service of plaintiff's amended infringement contentions;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff's counsel had included the claim charts for Claims 26 and 29 when counsel sought Defendant's consent to plaintiff's amended infringement contentions and Defendant had consented to their inclusion in the amended infringement contentions;

WHEREAS, Defendant's counsel graciously brought the omission of Claims 26 and 29 to plaintiff's counsel's attention and has consented to permit plaintiff to correct this clerical error and serve corrected infringement contentions in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A.

WHEREAS, Exhibit A is the same as the amended claim construction charts attached as Exhibit A to Doc 91, except for inclusion of the inadvertently omitted claims.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff seeks to serve corrected amended infringement contentions;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff's proposed corrected amended infringement contentions are submitted concurrently herewith as Appendix A;

WHEREAS, Defendant consents to Plaintiff's service of corrected amended infringement contentions, subject to the entry of this Order;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff submits that its proposed corrected amendment to his infringement contentions would not prejudice Defendant, since it is a clerical correction.

WHEREAS, Defendant, if it deems it necessary, shall have forty-five (45) days to respond to Plaintiff's corrected amended infringement contentions by providing amended invalidity contentions;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff consents to Defendant serving its amended invalidity contentions forty five (45) days after Plaintiff's filing of his corrected amended infringement contentions if Defendant elects to do so;

WHEREAS, By consenting to the service of amended infringement contentions, Defendant is not conceding and expressly reserves all rights to contest the legal or factual adequacy of Plaintiff's alleged amended infringement contentions including all issues raised in Defendant's letter to the Court regarding Plaintiff's First Amended Infringement Contentions [Doc 50];; and

WHEREAS, The service of Plaintiff's corrected amended infringement contentions and Defendant' optional service of amended invalidity contentions will not affect any of the deadlines set by the Court's orders or the Local Rules.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant agree that renewed or additional document production or other obligation by Defendant under Patent L.R. 3-4 will not be triggered or required by the filing of corrected amended infringement contentions or the service of Defendant' amended invalidity contentions, and Plaintiff will not request any additional documents to be served under Patent L.R. 3-4.

WHEREFORE, IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

1. That pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-6, Plaintiff's corrected amended infringement contentions shall be served no later than five business days after entry of this Order; and

2. That pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-6, Defendant shall have 45 days from service of Plaintiff's corrected amended infringement contentions to serve its amended invalidity contentions, if it elects to do so.

In accordance with N.D. Cal. General Order No. 45, Section X, the filer of this document attests that she obtained the consent of the other signatory hereto.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Daed: February 11, 2015. Respectfully submitted, By: /s/Victoria E. Brieant Victoria E. Brieant (CA Bar No. 141519) Law Office of Victoria E. Brieant

ORDER

Based on the foregoing stipulation and good cause appearing,

IT IS SO ORDERED.

1. Plaintiff Freeman's proposed corrected amended infringement contentions shall be served no later than five business days after entry of this Order; and

2. Defendant Delta Air Lines shall have 45 days from service of Plaintiff's corrected amended infringement contentions to serve its amended invalidity contentions.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer