Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Furnace v. Nuckles, C 09-6075 MMC (EDL). (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150319975 Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 18, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO FILE STIPULATION/PROPOSED ORDER RESOLVING PLAINTIFF'S PENDING MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENA TO CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION Pursuant to L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2(a), and 7-12. ELIZABETH D. LaPORTE , Magistrate Judge . STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME TO FILE STIPULATION/PROPOSED ORDER RESOLVING PLAINTIFF'S PENDING MOTION TO COMPEL Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena to the California Depar
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO FILE STIPULATION/PROPOSED ORDER RESOLVING PLAINTIFF'S PENDING MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENA TO CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION

Pursuant to L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2(a), and 7-12.

STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME TO FILE STIPULATION/PROPOSED ORDER RESOLVING PLAINTIFF'S PENDING MOTION TO COMPEL

Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation ("Motion") is currently pending. Plaintiff's and the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation's ("CDCR") current deadline to file a stipulation or proposed order resolving Plaintiff's Motion is Friday, March 20, 2015. See Docket No. 268.

CDCR and Plaintiff have agreed to stipulate to change the deadline for the joint filing from March 20, 2015 to March 27, 2015. The extra week will accommodate CDCR's counsel's schedule, give Plaintiff's counsel additional time to review and analyze CDCR's February 23, 2015 production, and enable Plaintiff and CDCR to continue to meet and confer regarding CDCR's response to Plaintiff's subpoena. (Declaration of Daniel H. Bookin ("Bookin Decl.") ¶ 2, filed concurrently herewith.) While there have previously been multiple time modifications in connection with the Motion, this requested enlargement will have no apparent effect on the schedule for this case. (Id. ¶ 3.)

Under Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff and CDCR submit this stipulation and proposed order.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO FILE STIPULATION/PROPOSED ORDER RESOLVING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION

The Court, having considered the above Stipulation of Plaintiff and CDCR and good cause appearing therefor, hereby orders as follows:

Plaintiff and CDCR's deadline to file a stipulation or proposed order resolving Plaintiff's Motion is extended from March 20, 2015 to March 27, 2015.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer