Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

YUCESOY v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 13-00262-EMC. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150817572 Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 14, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: ONE-DAY BENCH TRIAL EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiffs Hakan Yucesoy, Abdi Mahammed, Mokhtar Talha, Brian Morris, and Pedro Sanchez ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Ryan Graves, and Travis Kalanick ("Defendants") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on May 22, 2015, Defendants filed a motion to compel arbitration, see
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: ONE-DAY BENCH TRIAL

STIPULATION

Plaintiffs Hakan Yucesoy, Abdi Mahammed, Mokhtar Talha, Brian Morris, and Pedro Sanchez ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Ryan Graves, and Travis Kalanick ("Defendants") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on May 22, 2015, Defendants filed a motion to compel arbitration, see Docket No. 62;

WHEREAS, on June 23, 2015, Plaintiffs filed their opposition to Defendants' motion to compel arbitration, see Docket No. 72;

WHEREAS, on July 8, 2015, Defendants filed their reply in support of their motion to compel arbitration, see Docket No. 80;

WHEREAS the hearing on Defendants' motion to compel arbitration took place on August 6, 2015;

WHEREAS, the Court ordered the Parties to meet and confer and to submit to the Court by August 13, 2015 a proposed scheduling order for a bench trial on the issue of whether Plaintiff Yucesoy formed a contract with Uber, see Docket No. 95;

WHEREAS, the Court has scheduled a further case management conference for November 19, 2015, see id.;

WHEREAS the Parties have conferred and agreed to propose November 19, 2015, for the bench trial on the issue of whether Plaintiff Yucesoy formed a contract with Uber, which date would be convenient for the Court and the Parties given that a further case management conference in this matter has already been scheduled for that day;

WHEREAS the Parties have conferred and further agreed that the deposition of Mr. Yucesoy will occur on November 17, 2015, in San Francisco, California, and that the deposition transcript will be in final form by November 19, 2015, for use at trial;

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate to and propose, subject to the approval of this Court, the following:

The bench trial on the issue of whether Plaintiff Yucesoy formed a contract with Uber will occur on November 23, 2015, at 9:30 a.m. and the deposition of Mr. Yucesoy will occur on November 17, 2015, in San Francisco, California.

IT IS SO STIPULATED

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer