GONZALES v. CITY OF SAN JOSE, CV13-0695 BLF. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160722g56
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 21, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A) BETH LABSON FREEMAN , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Mary Lou Gonzales ("Plaintiff") and defendants City of San Jose, Matthew Archer, and Yvonne De La Cruz ("Defendants") that in response to the resolution obtained and after having met and conferred, Plaintiff's Complaint and each cause of action should be dismissed with prejudice. The parties thereby agree as follows: Plaintiff's claims are dism
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A) BETH LABSON FREEMAN , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Mary Lou Gonzales ("Plaintiff") and defendants City of San Jose, Matthew Archer, and Yvonne De La Cruz ("Defendants") that in response to the resolution obtained and after having met and conferred, Plaintiff's Complaint and each cause of action should be dismissed with prejudice. The parties thereby agree as follows: Plaintiff's claims are dismi..
More
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL Fed. R. Civ. P. §41(a)(1)(A)
BETH LABSON FREEMAN, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Mary Lou Gonzales ("Plaintiff") and defendants City of San Jose, Matthew Archer, and Yvonne De La Cruz ("Defendants") that in response to the resolution obtained and after having met and conferred, Plaintiff's Complaint and each cause of action should be dismissed with prejudice.
The parties thereby agree as follows:
Plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice. All claims and parties are dismissed by way of this Stipulation. This Stipulation and Dismissal is brought pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A).
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
[PROPOSED]ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the stipulation is GRANTED.
Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed with prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
