Filed: Oct. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 27, 2016
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION TO FILE RESPONSE TO COUNTY DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS Re: Dkt. No. 81 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . Plaintiff Terry Weiss, proceeding pro se , brings this action against the Santa Rosa Police Department, individuals associated with the police department individually and in their official capacity, and certain Sonoma County entities and individuals herein referred to as the "County Defendants." 1 Plaintiff filed a third ame
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION TO FILE RESPONSE TO COUNTY DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS Re: Dkt. No. 81 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . Plaintiff Terry Weiss, proceeding pro se , brings this action against the Santa Rosa Police Department, individuals associated with the police department individually and in their official capacity, and certain Sonoma County entities and individuals herein referred to as the "County Defendants." 1 Plaintiff filed a third amen..
More
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION TO FILE RESPONSE TO COUNTY DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
Re: Dkt. No. 81
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Terry Weiss, proceeding pro se, brings this action against the Santa Rosa Police Department, individuals associated with the police department individually and in their official capacity, and certain Sonoma County entities and individuals herein referred to as the "County Defendants."1 Plaintiff filed a third amended complaint on September 19, 2016. (Dkt. No. 76.) On September 30, 2016, the County Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the claims against them. (Dkt. No. 77.) Plaintiff's response was due on October 14, 2016. On October 21, 2016, County Defendants filed a Notice of No Opposition (Dkt. No. 80), and on October 24, 2016, plaintiff filed a Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 81), which County Defendants oppose (Dkt. No. 82).
In the interest of justice, the Court GRANTS plaintiff's request for an extension to file a response. Plaintiff's response must be filed no later than November 2, 2016, and County Defendants shall file their reply seven days thereafter. The Court notes, however, that plaintiff has missed several deadlines already, and the Court has previously had to issue an Order to Show Cause because of plaintiff's failure to meet such deadlines. (See Dkt. No. 48.) Additionally, on June 24, 2016, the Court granted plaintiff's request for permission to file documents electronically, which should have better facilitated her ability to meet her deadlines. (Dkt. No. 69.) Thus, the Court will not grant any further requests for extensions from plaintiff, absent a compelling reason for such request.
The Court also VACATES the hearing on County Defendants' motion to dismiss, currently set for November 15, 2016.
This Order terminates Docket Number 81.
IT IS SO ORDERED.