Filed: Feb. 09, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 09, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE EXPERT REPORT AND TESTIMONY OF RANDALL A. SNYDER RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Plaintiff Jose Albino Lucero Jr. and Defendant Solar City, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on January 27, 2017, Defendants filed, in conjunction with their Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification, their Notice of Motion an
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE EXPERT REPORT AND TESTIMONY OF RANDALL A. SNYDER RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Plaintiff Jose Albino Lucero Jr. and Defendant Solar City, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on January 27, 2017, Defendants filed, in conjunction with their Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification, their Notice of Motion and..
More
STIPULATION AND[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE EXPERT REPORT AND TESTIMONY OF RANDALL A. SNYDER
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
Plaintiff Jose Albino Lucero Jr. and Defendant Solar City, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, on January 27, 2017, Defendants filed, in conjunction with their Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification, their Notice of Motion and Motion to Exclude the Expert Report and Testimony of Randall A. Snyder (the "Motion") (Dkt. No. 100);
WHEREAS, Plaintiff's Opposition to the Motion is currently due February 10, 2017, Defendant's Reply in support of the Motion is currently due February 17, 2017, and the hearing is set for March 9, 2017 (at the same date and time as the hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification);
WHEREAS, in order to accommodate counsel's schedule and ensure adequate time to brief the issues, both parties wish to have additional time to complete their respective briefs;
WHEREAS, the requested modification to the briefing schedule will have no effect on any other part of the schedule for this case;
THE PARTIES THEREFORE STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS, subject to the Court's approval:
1. Plaintiff's Opposition to the Motion shall be due February 17, 2017
2. Defendant's Reply in support of the Motion shall be due March 3, 2017
3. The noticed hearing date of March 9, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. will not change.
ECF Signature Certification
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby certify that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.
/s/ Joshua Arisohn
Joshua Arisohn
[PROPOSED]ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.