Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CHANEL, INC. v. HSIAO YIN FU, 16-cv-02259-EMC. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170315b06 Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 14, 2017
Summary: SECOND ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING AND/OR EVIDENCE Docket No. 61. EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Chanel has moved for a default judgment against Ms. Fu. As part of its motion, Chanel asks to be awarded its attorney's fees. Chanel has submitted its billing records to support its fee request. With regard to the billing records, Chanel notes that it has redacted some of the records and that the redactions reflect "tasks for which we do not seek reimbursement, and, in a handful of entrie
More

SECOND ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING AND/OR EVIDENCE

Docket No. 61.

Chanel has moved for a default judgment against Ms. Fu. As part of its motion, Chanel asks to be awarded its attorney's fees. Chanel has submitted its billing records to support its fee request. With regard to the billing records, Chanel notes that it has redacted some of the records and that the redactions reflect "tasks for which we do not seek reimbursement, and, in a handful of entries, privileged information." Docket No. 63-2 (Keller Decl. ¶ 9). Because the redactions give rise to some ambiguity, the Court hereby orders as follows.

(1) Chanel shall identify which entries represent tasks for which it does not seek reimbursement and shall identify how much time has been excluded as a result.

(2) Chanel shall identify which entries have been redacted for privileged information and shall clarify whether it is seeking reimbursement for those redacted tasks. If reimbursement is not being sought, then Chanel shall identify how much time has been excluded.

The supplemental papers shall be filed no later than noon on March 15, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer